Your cart is currently empty!
Laden Sie die neuesten DeutschPrüfung Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF-Versionen von Prüfungsfragen kostenlos von Google Drive herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VHsnI4viDcUB1H7_1x4gzEN_KQ12qeTh
Unser DeutschPrüfung ist eine fachliche IT-Website. Ihre Erfolgsquote beträgt 100%. Viele Kandidaten haben das schon bewiesen. Weil wir ein riesiges IT-Expertenteam hat, das nach ihren fachlichen Erfahrungen und Kenntnissen die Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen und Antworten bearbeitet, um die Interessen der Kandidaten zu schützen und zugleich ihren Bedürfnisse abzudecken. Nach den Bedürfnissen der Kandidaten haben sie zielgerichtete und anwendbare Schulungsmaterialien entworfen, nämlich die Schulungsunterlagen zur Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung, die Fragen und Antworten enthalten.
| Thema | Einzelheiten |
|---|---|
| Thema 1 |
|
| Thema 2 |
|
| Thema 3 |
|
| Thema 4 |
|
>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Buch <<
Sind Sie ein IT-Mann? Haben Sie sich an der populären IT-Zertifizirungsprüfung beteiligt? Wenn ja, würde ich Ihnen sagen, dass Sie wirklich glücklich sind. Unsere Schulungsunterlagen zur Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung von DeutschPrüfung werden Ihnen helfen, die Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Prüfung 100% zu bestehen. Das ist eine echte Nachricht. Wollen Sie Fortschritte in der IT-Branche machen, wählen Sie doch DeutschPrüfung. Unsere Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps können Ihnen zum Bestehen allen Zertifizierungsprüfungen verhelfen. Sie sind außerdem billig. Wenn Sie nicht glauben, gucken Sie mal und Sie werden das Wissen.
21. Frage
A Generative Al Engineer has built an LLM-based system that will automatically translate user text between two languages. They now want to benchmark multiple LLM's on this task and pick the best one. They have an evaluation set with known high quality translation examples. They want to evaluate each LLM using the evaluation set with a performant metric.
Which metric should they choose for this evaluation?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
The task is to benchmark LLMs for text translation using an evaluation set with known high-quality examples, requiring a performant metric. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: ROUGE metric
* ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) measures overlap between generated and reference texts, primarily for summarization. It's less suited for translation, where precision and word order matter more.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is commonly used for summarization, not translation evaluation"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: BLEU metric
* BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) evaluates translation quality by comparing n-gram overlap with reference translations, accounting for precision and brevity. It's widely used, performant, and appropriate for this task.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU is a standard metric for evaluating machine translation, balancing accuracy and efficiency"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: NDCG metric
* NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) assesses ranking quality, not text generation.
It's irrelevant for translation evaluation.
* Databricks Reference:"NDCG is suited for ranking tasks, not generative output scoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: RECALL metric
* Recall measures retrieved relevant items but doesn't evaluate translation quality (e.g., fluency, correctness). It's incomplete for this use case.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract, but recall alone lacks the granularity of BLEU for text generation tasks.
Conclusion: Option B (BLEU) is the best metric for translation evaluation, offering a performant and standard approach, as endorsed by Databricks' guidance on generative tasks.
22. Frage
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.
23. Frage
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with improving the RAG quality by addressing its inflammatory outputs.
Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Addressing offensive or inflammatory outputs in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system is critical for improving user experience and ensuring ethical AI deployment. Here's whyDis the most effective approach:
* Manual data curation: The root cause of offensive outputs often comes from the underlying data used to train the model or populate the retrieval system. By manually curating the upstream data and conducting thorough reviews before the data is fed into the RAG system, the engineer can filter out harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content.
* Improving data quality: Curating data ensures the system retrieves and generates responses from a high-quality, well-vetted dataset. This directly impacts the relevance and appropriateness of the outputs from the RAG system, preventing inflammatory content from being included in responses.
* Effectiveness: This strategy directly tackles the problem at its source (the data) rather than just mitigating the consequences (such as informing users or restricting access). It ensures that the system consistently provides non-offensive, relevant information.
Other options, such as increasing the frequency of data updates or informing users about behavior expectations, may not directly mitigate the generation of inflammatory outputs.
24. Frage
A Generative Al Engineer is helping a cinema extend its website's chat bot to be able to respond to questions about specific showtimes for movies currently playing at their local theater. They already have the location of the user provided by location services to their agent, and a Delta table which is continually updated with the latest showtime information by location. They want to implement this new capability In their RAG application.
Which option will do this with the least effort and in the most performant way?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
The task is to extend a cinema chatbot to provide movie showtime information using a RAG application, leveraging user location and a continuously updated Delta table, with minimal effort and high performance.
Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Databricks Feature Serving provides low-latency access to real-time data from Delta tables via an online store. Syncing the Delta table to a Feature Serving Endpoint allows the chatbot to query showtimes efficiently, integrating seamlessly into the RAG agent'stool logic. This leverages Databricks' native infrastructure, minimizing effort and ensuring performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Feature Serving Endpoints provide real-time access to Delta table data with low latency, ideal for production systems"("Databricks Feature Engineering Guide," 2023).
* Option B: Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
* Using a text-to-SQL LLM to generate queries adds complexity (e.g., ensuring accurate SQL generation) and latency (LLM inference + SQL execution). While feasible, it's less performant and requires more effort than a pre-built serving solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Direct SQL queries are flexible but may introduce overhead in real-time applications"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Write the Delta table contents to a text column, then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index. Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Converting structured Delta table data (e.g., showtimes) into text, embedding it, and using vector search is inefficient for structured lookups. It's effort-intensive (preprocessing, embedding) and less precise than direct queries, undermining performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector search excels for unstructured data, not structured tabular lookups"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option D: Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Exporting to an external database (e.g., MySQL) adds setup effort (workflow, external DB management) and latency (periodic updates vs. real-time). It's less performant and more complex than using Databricks' native tools.
* Databricks Reference:"Avoid external systems when Delta tables provide real-time data natively"("Databricks Workflows Guide").
Conclusion: Option A minimizes effort by using Databricks Feature Serving for real-time, low-latency access to the Delta table, ensuring high performance in a production-ready RAG chatbot.
25. Frage
A Generative AI Engineer is designing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform. The platform provides real-time updates and LLM-generated analyses for any users who would like to have live summaries, rather than reading a series of potentially outdated news articles.
Which tool below will give the platform access to real-time data for generating game analyses based on the latest game scores?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
* Problem Context: The engineer is developing an LLM-powered live sports commentary platform that needs to provide real-time updates and analyses based on the latest game scores. The critical requirement here is the capability to access and integrate real-time data efficiently with the platform for immediate analysis and reporting.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DatabricksIQ: While DatabricksIQ offers integration and data processing capabilities, it is more aligned with data analytics rather than real-time feature serving, which is crucial for immediate updates necessary in a live sports commentary context.
* Option B: Foundation Model APIs: These APIs facilitate interactions with pre-trained models and could be part of the solution, but on their own, they do not provide mechanisms to access real- time game scores.
* Option C: Feature Serving: This is the correct answer as feature serving specifically refers to the real-time provision of data (features) to models for prediction. This would be essential for an LLM that generates analyses based on live game data, ensuring that the commentary is current and based on the latest events in the sport.
* Option D: AutoML: This tool automates the process of applying machine learning models to real-world problems, but it does not directly provide real-time data access, which is a critical requirement for the platform.
Thus,Option C(Feature Serving) is the most suitable tool for the platform as it directly supports the real-time data needs of an LLM-powered sports commentary system, ensuring that the analyses and updates are based on the latest available information.
26. Frage
......
Damit wir besser auf die derzeitigen Herausforderungen reagieren und Ihnen die Fragenkataloge zur Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung von besserer Qualität bieten können, versuchen wir, unser Bestes zu tun, indem wir die IT-Elite Gruppe von DeutschPrüfung verändern und die Testaufgaben von der Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung rechtzeitig aktualisieren. Unser Ziel liegt darin, dass Sie die Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung in kürzester Zeit leicht bestehen können. Bevor Sie unsere Prüfungsmaterialien kaufen, können Sie ein paar kostenlose Prüfungsfragen und Antworten herunterladen und proben.
Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Antworten: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html
P.S. Kostenlose und neue Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von DeutschPrüfung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VHsnI4viDcUB1H7_1x4gzEN_KQ12qeTh