ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Objectives Pdf, Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Exam

In this information-dominated society, boosting plenty stocks of knowledge and being competent in some certain area can establish yourself in society and help you get a high social status. Passing ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN certification can help you realize these goals and find a good job with high income. If you buy our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Practice Test you can pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam successfully and easily. And if you study with our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions for only 20 to 30 hours, you will pass the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam easily.

The field of PECB is growing rapidly and you need the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN certification to advance your career in it. But clearing the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test is not an easy task. Applicants often don't have enough time to study for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam. They are in desperate need of real PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam questions which can help them prepare for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN test successfully in a short time.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Objectives Pdf <<

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Exam, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Latest Exam Preparation

The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN PDF works on smart phones, tablets, and laptops. Windows computers support the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN desktop practice test software. No software installation is necessary for the web-based PECB Exam practice exam. All operating systems (Mac, Linus, Android, iOS, Windows) and major browsers support the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN web-based practice exam.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Sample Questions (Q310-Q315):

NEW QUESTION # 310
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊負責人，正在與分配給您的審核團隊的正在接受培訓的審核員進行交談。您希望確保他們了解計劃-實施-檢查-行動週期的檢查階段對於資訊安全管理系統的運作的重要性。
您可以透過要求他選擇最能完成句子的單字來做到這一點：
要使用最佳單字完成句子，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將該選項拖曳到適當的空白部分。

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
* Review is the third stage of the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, which is a four-step model for implementing and improving an information security management system (ISMS) according to ISO
/IEC 27001:202212. Review involves assessing and measuring the performance of the ISMS against the established policies, objectives, and criteria12.
* Assess is the verb that describes the action of reviewing the ISMS. Assess means to evaluate, analyze, or measure something in a systematic and objective manner3. Assessing the ISMS involves collecting and verifying audit evidence, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and determining the degree of conformity or nonconformity12.
* Regular is the adjective that describes the frequency or interval of reviewing the ISMS. Regular means occurring or done at fixed or uniform intervals4. Reviewing the ISMS at regular intervals means conducting internal audits and management reviews periodically, such as annually, quarterly, or monthly, depending on the needs and risks of the organization12.
* Suitability is one of the attributes that describes the quality or outcome of reviewing the ISMS. Suitability means being appropriate or fitting for a particular purpose, person, or situation5. Reviewing the ISMS for suitability means ensuring that it is aligned with the organization's strategic direction, business objectives, and information security requirements12.
References :=
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements
* ISO/IEC 27003:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Guidance
* Assess | Definition of Assess by Merriam-Webster
* Regular | Definition of Regular by Merriam-Webster
* Suitability | Definition of Suitability by Merriam-Webster

NEW QUESTION # 311
您正在進行 ISMS 審核。審計計劃的下一步是驗證組織的資訊安全風險處理計劃是否已製定並正確實施。您決定採訪 IT 安全經理。
您：能否請您解釋一下組織是如何進行資訊安全風險評估和處理流程的？
IT 安全經理：我們遵循資訊安全風險管理程序，產生風險處理計劃。
旁白：您回顧了第 123 號風險處理計劃，該計劃涉及計劃安裝電子（隱形）圍欄，以提高療養院的物理安全。您發現風險處理計劃已獲得 IT 安全經理的批准。
您：誰要為實體安全風險負責？
IT 安全經理：設施經理負責實體安全風險。 IT部門幫助他們監控警報。授權設施經理批准123號風險處理計畫的預算。
您：123號風險處置預案實施後，還有哪些資訊安全風險殘留？
IT安全經理：據我了解，目前還沒有關於殘留資訊安全風險接受的資訊。
您準備您的審計結果。為場景中合理的發現選擇三個選項。

A. 不合格 (NC) - 最高管理階層必須確保 ISMS 所需的資源可用。第 5.1.c 條
B. 不合格（NC）－風險處理實施後，應更新殘餘資訊安全風險的接受資訊。第 6.1.3.f 條
C. 採用最先進的技術作為持續改進流程的一部分是良好的做法
D. 不合格 (NC) - 第 123 號風險處理計畫應由風險負責人（在本例中為設施經理）批准。第 6.1.3.f 條
E. 一旦安裝了電子（隱形）圍欄，就有改進的機會（OI）。
居民人身安全得到改善
F. 不合格 (NC) - 組織應提供持續改善 ISMS 所需的資源。第 7.1 條
G. 有一個改進機會 (OI)，可以對週邊圍欄進行安全檢查
H. 不合格 (NC) - IT 安全經理應該意識到並理解他的權限和責任範圍。第7.3條

Answer: B,D,H

Explanation:
The three options for findings that are justified in the scenario are:
*Nonconformity (NC) - The information for the acceptance of residual information security risks should be updated after the risk treatment is implemented. Clause 6.1.3.f
*Nonconformity (NC) - The IT security manager should be aware of and understand his authority and area of responsibility. Clause 7.3
*Nonconformity (NC) - The risk treatment plan No. 123 should be approved by the risk owner, the Facility Manager in this case. Clause 6.1.3.f According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3.f, the organisation must retain documented information that includes the information for the acceptance of residual information security risks, and the approval of the risk treatment plan by the risk owner1. Therefore, option A and G are justified as nonconformities, because the organisation failed to update the information for the acceptance of residual risks, and the risk treatment plan was approved by the IT security manager, who is not the risk owner.
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.3, the organisation must ensure that the persons assigned to perform the roles and responsibilities for the ISMS are competent, and are aware of the consequences of not conforming to the ISMS requirements2. Therefore, option E is justified as a nonconformity, because the IT security manager, who is responsible for the information security risk management process, was not aware of his authority and area of responsibility.
The other options are not justified as findings, because they are either irrelevant or incorrect. For example:
*Option B is irrelevant, because it is not related to the information security risk treatment plan No. 123, which is the focus of the audit.
*Option C is incorrect, because it is not an opportunity for improvement, but rather a benefit of the risk treatment plan No. 123, which is already implemented.
*Option D is incorrect, because it is not a nonconformity, but rather a requirement for the organisation to provide the resources needed for the ISMS, which is not the same as the resources needed for the risk treatment plan No. 123.
*Option F is incorrect, because it is not a nonconformity, but rather a requirement for the organisation to provide the resources needed for the continual improvement of the ISMS, which is not the same as the resources needed for the risk treatment plan No. 123.
*Option H is irrelevant, because it is not a finding, but rather a good practice, which is not the objective of the audit.
References: 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 6.1.3.f; 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 7.3; : ISO/IEC 27001:2022; : ISO/IEC
27001:2022

NEW QUESTION # 312
場景 2：
Clinic 成立於 20 世紀 90 年代，是一家專門治療心臟相關疾病和複雜外科手術的醫療器材公司。該公司總部位於歐洲，為患者和醫療保健專業人士提供服務。診所收集患者數據以客製化治療方案、監測結果並改善設備功能。為了增強資料安全性和建立信任，Clinic 正在實施基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS)。
診所僅透過考慮內部問題、介面、內部和外包活動之間的依賴關係以及相關方的期望來確定其 ISMS 的範圍。此範圍已仔細記錄並可供查閱。在定義其 ISMS 時，Clinic 選擇專注於關鍵部門內的關鍵流程，例如研發、病患資料管理和客戶支援。
儘管最初面臨挑戰，Clinic 仍然致力於實施 ISMS，並根據其獨特需求量身定制安全控制。專案團隊從 ISO/IEC 27001 中排除了某些附件 A 控制，同時加入了額外的特定產業控制以增強安全性。該團隊根據內部和外部因素評估了這些控制的適用性，最終制定了全面的適用性聲明 (SoA)，詳細說明了控制選擇和實施背後的理由。
隨著認證準備工作的進展，被任命為團隊負責人的 Brian 採用了自我導向的風險評估方法來識別和評估公司的策略問題和安全實踐。這種積極主動的方法確保診所的風險評估與其目標和使命保持一致。
基於場景2，診所初步確定了其資訊安全目標，然後進行了風險評估。這可以接受嗎？

A. 是的，因為可以稍後調整目標以適應風險評估結果
B. 不，因為風險評估應僅在目標完全實現後進行
C. 不，必須根據 ISO/IEC 27001 的要求，建立資訊安全目標，並考慮風險評估結果

Answer: C

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
C . Correct Answer: ISO/IEC 27001 Clause 6.2 (Information Security Objectives and Planning A . Incorrect: While objectives can be revised, they must be initially established based on risk assessment findings.
B . Incorrect: Objectives should be set after risk assessment, but security objectives are not dependent on full implementation.

NEW QUESTION # 313
情境 6：Sinvestment 是一家提供家庭保險、商業保險和人壽保險的保險公司。該公司成立於北卡羅來納州，但最近在其他地區進行了擴張，包括歐洲和非洲。
Sinvestment 致力於遵守適用於其行業的法律法規，並防止任何資訊安全事件。他們實施了基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的 ISMS 並申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。
認證機構指派兩名審核員進行審核。與Sinvestment簽訂保密協議後。他們開始了審計活動。首先，他們審查了標準要求的文件，包括 ISMS 範圍聲明、資訊安全政策和內部稽核報告。審查過程並不容易，因為儘管 Sinvestment 表示他們已製定文件程序，但並非所有文件都具有相同的格式。
隨後，審計小組對Sinvestment的高階主管進行了多次訪談，以了解他們在ISMS實施中的作用。第一階段審計的所有活動都是遠端進行的，除了根據 Sinvestment 的要求在現場進行的文件資訊審查之外。
在此階段，審計人員發現沒有與資訊安全培訓和意識計劃相關的文件。被問及時，Sinvestment代表表示，公司已為所有員工提供資訊安全培訓課程。第一階段審計讓審計團隊對 Sinvestment 的營運和 ISMS 有了整體了解。
第二階段審核在第一階段審核三週後進行。審計小組觀察到，行銷部門（未包含在審計範圍內）沒有適當的程序來控制員工的存取權限。由於控制員工的存取權限是ISO/IEC 27001的要求之一，並且已包含在公司的資訊安全政策中，因此該問題包含在審計報告中。此外，在第二階段審計中，審計小組觀察到Sinvestment沒有記錄使用者活動日誌。
該公司的程序規定“記錄用戶活動的日誌應保留並定期審查”，但該公司沒有提供任何執行該程序的證據。
在所有審核活動中，審核員透過觀察、訪談、文件化資訊審查、分析和技術驗證來收集資訊和證據。對第一階段和第二階段的所有審核結果進行了分析，審核小組決定發布積極的認證建議。
根據ISO/IEC 27001要求，公司是否需要提供執行有關記錄使用者活動的日誌程式的證據？請參閱場景 6。

A. 否，因為該流程的實施不是標準的要求
B. 否，本公司僅建議實施此程序
C. 是的，記錄使用者活動的事件日誌必須保存並定期審查

Answer: C

Explanation:
Yes, according to ISO/IEC 27001, the company needs to provide evidence of the implementation of procedures regarding the logging of user activities. This requirement is essential to ensure that events are recorded and regularly reviewed, supporting the detection and prevention of security incidents.

NEW QUESTION # 314
情境 4：SendPay 是一家金融公司，透過代理商和金融機構網路提供服務。他們的主要服務之一是在全球範圍內轉帳。 SendPay 作為一家新公司，致力於為客戶提供最優質的服務。由於該公司提供國際交易，因此要求客戶提供個人信息，例如身份、交易原因以及完成交易可能需要的其他詳細信息。因此，SendPay 已實施安全措施來保護客戶的訊息，包括偵測、調查和回應可能出現的任何資訊安全威脅。他們對提供安全服務的承諾也體現在 ISMS 實施過程中，該公司投入了大量時間和資源。
去年，SendPay 推出了他們的數位平台，允許透過智慧型手機或筆記型電腦等電子設備進行貨幣交易，而無需支付額外費用。透過這個平台，SendPay 的客戶可以隨時隨地發送和接收資金。該數位平台幫助SendPay簡化了公司營運並進一步拓展了業務。當時SendPay正在外包其軟體業務，因此該專案是由外包公司的軟體開發團隊完成的。
該團隊還負責維護 SendPay 的技術基礎設施。
最近，該公司在實施 ISMS 近一年後申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。他們與符合其標準的認證機構簽訂了合約。不久之後，認證機構任命了一個由四名審核員組成的團隊來審核 SendPay 的 ISMS。
審計過程中，發現以下情況：
1.外包軟體公司在未事先通知的情況下終止了與SendPay的合約。結果，SendPay 無法立即將服務恢復到內部，其營運中斷了五天。審計人員要求 SendPay 的代表提供證據，證明他們在合約終止的情況下有計劃遵循。這些代表沒有提供任何書面證據，但在接受審計時，他們告訴審計人員，SendPay的高層已經確定了另外兩家軟體開發公司，如果類似情況再次發生，可以立即提供服務。
2. 沒有證據顯示對外包給軟體開發公司的活動進行了監控。 SendPay 的代表再次告訴審計人員，他們定期與軟體開發公司溝通，並適當地告知可能發生的任何變更。
3.防火牆測試未發現異常狀況。審核員測試了防火牆配置，以確定這些服務提供的安全等級。他們使用資料包分析器來測試防火牆策略，這使他們能夠即時檢查發送或接收的資料包。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
根據情境 4，審計人員要求提供有關外包業務監控過程的文件證據。這說明什麼？

A. 審核員表現出專業懷疑態度
B. 審計人員洩漏了外包業務的機密性
C. 審計師根據基於風險的方法評估了證據

Answer: A

Explanation:
Based on the provided scenario, the auditors' request for documentary evidence regarding the monitoring process of outsourced operations indicates that the auditors demonstrated professional skepticism. This is because professional skepticism involves a critical assessment of audit evidence and includes a questioning mind and a careful evaluation of the information provided by the auditee123.
Professional skepticism is an essential part of the auditing process, especially in the context of ISO/IEC
27001, which requires auditors to systematically examine an organization's information security risks, including the management of outsourced processes4. The auditors' request for evidence suggests that they were not satisfied with verbal assurances alone and sought to verify that SendPay had a formal, documented process for monitoring outsourced activities, which is a requirement for maintaining an effective Information Security Management System (ISMS)5.
Therefore, the correct answer is: A. The auditors demonstrated professional skepticism.

NEW QUESTION # 315
......

We offer free demos of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN exam braindumps for your reference before you pay for them, for there are three versions of the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN practice engine so that we also have three versions of the free demos. And we will send you the new updates if our experts make them freely. On condition that you fail the exam after using our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Study Guide unfortunately, we will switch other versions for you or give back full of your refund. All we do and the promises made are in your perspective.

Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Exam: https://www.realexamfree.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-real-exam-dumps.html

In order to clear exams and obtain the PECB Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Mock Exam certificate successfully, exam examinees have been looking for the valid preparation materials in the internet to get the desirable passing score eagerly, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Objectives Pdf In addition, we will hold irregularly preferential activities and discounts for you on occasion, PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Test Objectives Pdf You may hesitate whether to take our software, or you're worry about it's worthy of buying it.

It will call `paint` when execution starts and any time after that when we request ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Latest Exam Preparation it, Consequently the investments made by the new powers, domestically and internationally, are more aggressive as well as different in nature than before.

Actual PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Question For Quick Success

In order to clear exams and obtain the PECB certificate successfully, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Latest Exam Preparation exam examinees have been looking for the valid preparation materials in the internet to get the desirable passing score eagerly.

In addition, we will hold irregularly preferential activities and Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Learning Materials discounts for you on occasion, You may hesitate whether to take our software, or you're worry about it's worthy of buying it.

You can learn a great deal of knowledge and get the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN certificate of the exam at one order like win-win outcome at one try, If you clear exams and obtain a certification with our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN torrent materials, you will be competitive for your company and your position may be replaceable.